A new quarterback grading model scores Jared Goff an 86 out of 100 as a "high-end starter," placing him just below elite tier with strong marks for consistency and durability but questions about his ability to take over games.

Jared Goff Gets Brutal 86/100 Grade That Proves What Lions Fans Already Know

A new quarterback grading model scores Jared Goff an 86 out of 100 as a "high-end starter," placing him just below elite tier with strong marks for consistency and durability but questions about his ability to take over games.

The Model That Finally Settles QB Arguments (Or Starts New Ones)

Look, we’ve all been there. Your buddy swears his quarterback is elite while yours is trash, and everyone’s just yelling about vibes and highlight reels. Well, someone finally built a grading model that cuts through the noise with actual data instead of social media hot takes.

This isn’t some fantasy football nonsense either. The model weighs six categories over a two-year period: production, efficiency, consistency, high-leverage impact, film gravity, and durability. Real metrics. Real situations that matter. The kind of stuff that actually wins games instead of just looking pretty on SportsCenter.

Detroit Lions Gear

And yes, they graded every starting quarterback in the league, including our guy Jared Goff.

Where Goff Actually Stands

The verdict? Goff scored an 86 out of 100, landing him in the “high-end starter” tier. Not elite, but damn close.

Before you start typing angry comments, hear this out. The model only handed “true elite” status to four quarterbacks: Patrick Mahomes (97), Josh Allen (96), Lamar Jackson (95), and Joe Burrow (94). That’s it. Four guys.

The “high-end elite” tier includes Jalen Hurts (90), Justin Herbert (89), Matthew Stafford (88), and Dak Prescott (87). Then you get to Goff’s tier alongside C.J. Stroud (86), Jordan Love (84), and Baker Mayfield (84).

Here’s how Goff broke down across the six categories:

Production: 90. Consistently high-level passing numbers year after year in this offense.

Efficiency: 88. Excellent rhythm passer with strong accuracy and smart decision-making within the structure.

Consistency: 90. One of the most stable quarterbacks in football with a high weekly floor.

Impact: 82. Strong at executing game plans and sustaining drives, but not quite a “takeover” guy like the dual-threat elites.

Film gravity: 76. Defenses respect his execution, but they’re not completely reshaping game plans around him.

Durability: 92. Highly reliable with consistent full-season presence.

The Reality Check

An 86 score puts Goff exactly where most honest Lions fans probably see him. He’s not going to single-handedly carry a broken roster to the promised land. But he’s also not the reason this team fails when it does.

Goff excels in the areas that matter most for what Dan Campbell wants to do. He’s consistent, efficient, and durable. He executes the game plan without trying to be a hero. In a league where quarterback play swings wildly week to week, that stability is worth something.

The model dinged him on film gravity, which tracks. Defenses aren’t losing sleep over stopping Jared Goff the way they do over Josh Allen or Lamar Jackson. They’re game-planning for our running game, our receivers, our offensive line. Goff benefits from that structure, but he also maximizes it.

This is what Brad Holmes and Dan Campbell signed up for when they committed to Goff long-term. Not a superstar, but a quarterback who won’t beat himself and will let the talent around him shine. In Allen Park, that’s been enough to build something sustainable.

Is an 86-grade quarterback good enough to finally get this franchise over the hump, or are we just settling for pretty good again? Let me know what you think below.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
0
What's your take? Leave a comment!x
()
x